Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 February 2012 -- Total and Elf Aquitaine v Commission (Case C-421/11 P) Appeal -- Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 -- Competition -- Cartel -- Market for methacrylates -- Concept of `undertaking' -- Presumption of decisive influence -- Obligation to state reasons -- Principle of sound administration -- Extension of the authority of a final decision -- Deterrent multiplying factor -- Indivisible nature of the fine -- Unlimited jurisdiction 1. Appeals -- Grounds -- Specific criticism of a point of the General Court's reasoning necessary (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 17, 31, 69-71) 2. Competition -- Union rules -- Infringements -- Attribution -- Parent company and subsidiaries -- Economic unit -- Criteria for assessment -- Presumption that a parent company wields decisive influence over its wholly-owned subsidiaries (Art. 101 TFEU; Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23(2)) (see paras 25, 28, 30, 33, 38, 46-50, 62) 3. Appeals -- Grounds -- Inadequate statement of reasons -- Reliance by the General Court on implied reasoning -- Whether permissible -- Conditions (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 36 and 53, first para.) (see paras 41-42) 4. Appeals -- Jurisdiction of the Court -- Challenge on grounds of fairness to the General Court's assessment concerning the amount of a fine imposed on an undertaking -- Excluded (Art. 101 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58; Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23) (see para. 87) Re: Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 June 2011 in Case T-206/06 Total and Elf Aquitaine v Commission , in which the General Court dismissed the action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 2098 final of 31 May 2006 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.645 -- Methacrylates) -- Competition -- Cartel -- Infringement of the principle that the institutions must act within the limits of their powers and of the principle of proportionality -- Manifestly erroneous interpretation -- Infringement of the rights of the defence and of the principles of equity and of equality of arms -- Duty to state reasons -- Infringement of the principle of sound administration. Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA are ordered to pay the costs.