Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2010 - Biocaps v
   Commission

   (Case T-24/09)

   Competition - Administrative procedure - Decision ordering an
   inspection - Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Existence of
   the addressee of the decision - Action manifestly unfounded in law

   1.                     Competition - Administrative procedure -
   Decision ordering an inspection - Addressee (Council Regulation No
   1/2003, Art. 20(4)) (see paras 25-26)

   2.                     Competition - Administrative procedure -
   Commission's power of inspection - Decision ordering a legal person and
   the entities controlled by it to submit to an inspection - Scope
   (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 20(4)) (see para. 32)

   Re:

   APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6524 of
   29 October 2008, in Case COMP/39510, ordering Laboratoire Champagnat
   Desmoulins Philippakis, and all of the entities controlled directly or
   indirectly by it, to submit to an inspection pursuant to Article 20(4)
   of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the
   implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81
   [EC] and 82 [EC] (OJ 2002 L 1, p. 1).

   Operative part

   1.

   The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law.

   2.

   Biocaps is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the
   European Commission.