Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 27 June 2012 -- Berning & Söhne v Commission (Case T-445/07) Competition -- Agreements, decisions and concerted practices -- Markets in zip fasteners and `other fasteners' and attaching machines -- Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC -- Coordinated price increases, fixing of minimum prices, sharing of customers and of markets and exchange of other business information -- Proof -- Rights of the defence -- Single and continuing infringement -- Time-bar -- Fines -- Duration and gravity of the infringement -- Mitigating circumstances -- Equal treatment -- Proportionality 1. Proceedings -- Measures of inquiry -- Hearing of witnesses -- Discretion of the General Court (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 68) (see paras 37, 38) 2. Competition -- Administrative procedure -- Statement of objections -- Necessary content -- Commission decision finding an infringement -- Decision not identical to the statement of objections -- Infringement of the rights of the defence -- Condition (Arts 81 EC and 82 EC; Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 27(1)) (see paras 47-50) 3. Agreements, decisions and concerted practices -- Agreements and concerted practices constituting a single infringement -- Undertakings that may be held responsible for participating in an overall cartel -- Criteria (Art. 81(1) EC) (see paras 69-72) 4. Competition -- Administrative procedure -- Time-limit with regard to proceedings -- Interruption -- Commission's decision to inspect -- Scope (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 25(3) and (4)) (see paras 104, 105) 5. Competition -- Administrative procedure -- Commission decision finding an infringement -- Burden of proving the duration of the infringement on the Commission -- Extent of the burden of proof (Arts 81 EC and 82 EC) (see paras 107, 109, 110) 6. Agreements, decisions and concerted practices -- Participation in meetings having an anti-competitive object -- Circumstances from which, where the undertaking concerned has not distanced itself from the decisions adopted, it may be concluded that it participated in the ensuing cartel -- Conduct deviating from that agreed within the cartel -- Not relevant (Art. 81(1) EC) (see paras 113-118, 130-134) 7. Competition -- Administrative procedure -- Commission decision finding an infringement -- Means of proof -- Reliance on a body of evidence -- Degree of evidential value necessary as regards items of evidence viewed in isolation (Arts 81 EC and 82 EC) (see paras 125-129) 8. Competition -- Administrative procedure -- Commission decision finding an infringement -- Burden of proving the infringement and its duration on the Commission -- Probative value of voluntary depositions made by the main participants in a cartel with a view to benefiting from the Leniency Notice (Art. 81(1) EC; Commission Notices 96/C 207/04 and 2002/C 45/03) (see paras 135, 136, 167, 168) 9. Competition -- Fines -- Amount -- Determination -- Criteria -- Commission's margin of discretion -- Judicial review -- Scope (Arts 81 EC and 82 EC; Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23(2); Commission Notice 98/C 9/03) (see paras 202-206) 10. Competition -- Fines -- Amount -- Determination -- Criteria -- Gravity and duration of the infringement -- Matters to be assessed (Arts 81 EC and 82 EC; Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23(2) and (3); Commission Notice 98/C 9/03) (see paras 207, 208, 210) 11. Competition -- Fines -- Amount -- Determination -- Criteria -- Gravity of the infringement -- Mitigating circumstances -- Passive or `follow-my-leader' role of the undertaking -- Criteria for assessment (Art. 81(1) EC; Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23(2) and (3); Commission Notice 98/C 9/03, Section 3, first indent) (see paras 216, 217, 219) Re: APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 4257 final of 19 September 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/39.168 -- PO/Hard Haberdashery: Fasteners) or, in the alternative, reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision. Operative part The Court: 1. Dismisses the action; 2. Orders Berning & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.